Re:EvalAI: An Open-Source Alternative to Kaggle
by studentrob on Friday June 25, 2021 @12:39AM
(#27627201)
> the comparison to Kaggle is added by the OP, I don't see it mentioned on the website anywhere
It's on their github page,
Re:EvalAI: An Open-Source Alternative to Kaggle
by tmabraham on Friday June 25, 2021 @02:59AM
(#27627900)
Ah that's unfortunate, I didn't know.
That said, my point still stands. Additionally, the comparison they did is massively unfair. I'm pretty sure Kaggle competitions have most of the feature they claim it doesn't have (ex: multiple phases, custom metrics, evaluation in environments).
Re:EvalAI: An Open-Source Alternative to Kaggle
by studentrob on Friday June 25, 2021 @03:02AM
(#27627912)
> Ah that's unfortunate, I didn't know.
No sweat, we can't know everything, god save the interwebs!
> the comparison they did is massively unfair.
Agreed. This is all puff
Re:EvalAI: An Open-Source Alternative to Kaggle
by lopuhin on Friday June 25, 2021 @10:00AM
(#27630869)
Kaggle has two parts - more popular "featured" competitions which have most of those features, but cost money to host. And then also self-hosted competitions which indeed lack all those features and are more relevant for this comparison IMO.
Re:EvalAI: An Open-Source Alternative to Kaggle
by seasily on Friday June 25, 2021 @12:37PM
(#27633096)
Their comparison chart is outright defamatory, as Kaggle features all of the below:
Custom metrics Multiple phases/splits Remote evaluation Human evaluation Evaluation in Environments
The actual rankings are: #1 Kaggle #2 DrivenData
Honorable mention but poorly managed: AiCrowd
No one else has any level of funding to incent performance.
I might add that the comparison to Kaggle is added by the OP, I don't see it mentioned on the website anywhere.