I'm pretty sure Al Capone was not about aggressive tax collecting but was instead about putting him away on the one thing they could actually prove and make it stick.

Edit:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2018/10/17/al-...

His 1099-MISC was lacking millions in income.

That was before 40 years of billionaires largely controlling the agenda of government, with the past 15 years in particular seeing audit rates for this class drop below audit rates for waitresses.

They're gone on record saying they only go after the small fry though. The big ones hold them up in litigation.

Really? IF the US is that aggressive about their tax dollars, what was the full fallout of the Panama Papers again?

I'm not going to say anything about McAfee at at this time, but your other example was not really a target for inditement based solely on his tax crimes.