Re:‘Vegan spider silk’ provides sustainable alternative to s...
by lotsofpulp on Thursday June 24, 2021 @09:24AM
(#27617039)
Conceptually, taxing it is very easy. Increasing taxes on fossil fuels will flow down to all fossil fuel derivatives, including plastic. Politically impossible, though.
Re:‘Vegan spider silk’ provides sustainable alternative to s...
by frumper on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:17AM
(#27618868)
Just some napkin math, in the US we make 100 billion plastic bags a year out of 12 million barrels of oil. That breaks down to about 200 bags/gallon or .7 cents worth of oil per bag at current oil rates of $57/barrel. If you taxed oil at 10 times the value of the oil, a bag would increase to 7 cents. I'm still not blinking much at that price, it's a rounding error to me and now I have $35/gallon gasoline. It sounds like it's easy conceptually to tax our way out of gasoline, but I still don't think most people would blink at the cost increase to plastic items.
Re:‘Vegan spider silk’ provides sustainable alternative to s...
by dehrmann on Thursday June 24, 2021 @12:36PM
(#27620043)
It hasn't helped that people have lumped issues with plastic together with climate change just because they both involve oil. Plastics use relatively little oil compared to transportation, and unless they're burned the carbon isn't released.
Re:‘Vegan spider silk’ provides sustainable alternative to s...
by lotsofpulp on Thursday June 24, 2021 @11:31AM
(#27619051)
Now that you have $35/gallon gasoline, you will have to adjust your whole lifestyle to consume less. 7 cents might start mattering to you now that you are having to make trade offs to meet your budget.
Taxing it appropriately is hard. I've often thought about a simple blanket markup per piece of tat, raising the price of said piece of tat from amusing chuckle to stupid waste of money. But how do you distinguish a piece of tat from medical supplies, for example? I don't think anyone dare suggest taxing all plastic products.