Re:The Google black hole: What happens to startups when they...
by jlogic77 on Thursday August 14, 2008 @11:25AM
(#276182)
I wonder what types of questions the founders are asking of Google pre-aquisition? As a founder, I would think you are concerned with what is Google's "vision" for your product/company. I could also see just the shiny things being enough to make me not worry about the vision.
Also, there are successes. Writely - > Google Docs seemed to be a pretty big success. I'm sure there are others.
Re:The Google black hole: What happens to startups when they...
by Timothee on Thursday August 14, 2008 @01:31PM
(#276292)
Keyhole -> Google Earth was a big success too.
The thing is that we tend to forget the successes a little bit because they got to merge so well with Google. Looking at the list of acquisitions on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_acquisitions), I can only think about Blogger but I have no experience on if it changed for the best. As far as I can tell, it looks like it's still working fine.
Re:The Google black hole: What happens to startups when they...
by neilk on Thursday August 14, 2008 @07:45PM
(#276591)
Yeah, Writely is a great counterexample. Their vision and Google's vision were really close, so they integrated well into Docs.
And just to show you that technical issues are not the primary problem, they were using Windows/C# but managed to port to Google's Linux/Java-based infrastructure and login system very quickly. (Granted, C# is way closer to Java than PHP).
Founders are supposed to take into consideration their product's role after acquisition when they're talking about getting bought out?
This isn't rocket science - once you sell your company to Google (or whomever), you don't own it anymore. That's why you get all those shiny coins.