Re:Tim Cook called Pelosi to warn her against disrupting the...
by solveit on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @11:57PM
(#27613824)
> I think you can crack down on even the appearance of corruption without paying huge salaries.
Sure, go ahead.
Less flippantly: Of course there's no law of physics forbidding it, but I believe the structural dynamics I described make this infeasible. I would be happy to see examples of societies that prove otherwise though.
> Finally, it seems very strange to answer clear-in-aggregate corruption by paying the corrupt more money.
Yes it is, which is why that's not really feasible either. Hence the catch-22.
Sure, go ahead.
Less flippantly: Of course there's no law of physics forbidding it, but I believe the structural dynamics I described make this infeasible. I would be happy to see examples of societies that prove otherwise though.
> Finally, it seems very strange to answer clear-in-aggregate corruption by paying the corrupt more money.
Yes it is, which is why that's not really feasible either. Hence the catch-22.