News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on What Is Voter Satisfaction Efficiency?. Parent comment

Re:What Is Voter Satisfaction Efficiency? by ranicki on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @11:17PM (#27613537)
You may be confusing CES with some other organization. I asked on CES's public discord:

    ranicki: someone on HN claimed that Center for Election Science switched from pushing STAR to pushing approval. is it true that this organization formerly supported STAR, or was it one of the other organizations? I don't remember who was advocating for what
    -redacted name-: Center for Election Science has broadly supported cardinal voting methods, score voting and approval voting basically since its inception. From everything I can tell it still is supportive of cardinal methods broadly, but as a political tactic has honed in on approval voting specifically due to its Pareto optimality.
    ...
    -redacted name 2-: I don't think CES ever changed from STAR to approval. IIRC they existed long before STAR was invented
(Names are redacted because I didn't ask permission to quote, but the discussion is publicly visible and not sensitive at all.)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is Voter Satisfaction Efficiency? by xpe on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @09:04AM (#27675209)
> "From everything I can tell it still is supportive of cardinal methods broadly, but as a political tactic has honed in on approval voting specifically due to its Pareto optimality."

Hmmm... the notion of Pareto optimality is driving political tactics (about what voting method to back)? I know what it means, and it seems strange to me. This suggests that a specialized economic term was used as a motivation for a tactical political decision.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is Voter Satisfaction Efficiency? by fdsjgfklsfd on Friday July 09, 2021 @12:10PM (#27785193)
CES was originally a research-based organization, but recently shifted to advocating Approval Voting and trying to get it implemented. (I think they should rename as the Center for Approval Voting.)

Their forum and Google Group for discussion of voting systems were good resources, but are now being shut down

https://forum.electionscience.org/t/archiving-the-forum-july...

https://groups.google.com/g/electionscience

"This change reflects CES’s gradual evolution from an academic organization to an advocacy organization."

A volunteer-run forum has been created to replace it, but is pretty quiet so far.

https://www.votingtheory.org/

http://reddit.com/r/EndFPTP is also a good "non-partisan" resource, as well as https://electowiki.org/wiki/Main_Page

[ Parent | on HN ]