> the very small community that we are talking about is disproportionately being subjected to murder
I believe this paper ought to suffice as the entry point for the non-scientific community to pursue the academic research that supports my original assertion:
Violence against transgender people: A review of United States data, Aggression and Violent Behavior, Volume 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 170-179
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S13591...
> The report related stories of 51 transgender and gender non-conforming individuals under the age of 30 who were murdered in the United States between 1995 and 2005.
Quite frankly, this number is even lower than the FBI's statistics.
[1] https://transgender.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Violenc...
> What is beginning to emerge from these multiple sources of data are the increased risks of variety of types of violence, though in particular sexual violence, faced by transgender people
Their conclusion directly states that there is an increased risk of violence for transgender people.
Secondarily, their conclusion also hints at there being empirical evidence that one cannot extrapolate from murder rates to cover all forms of victim-having crime. That would imply that your argument is indeed suffering from the law of averages.
I hope you see how weak your argument is when your own cited paper merely "hints" at your purported conclusion.
It directly supports my original conclusion that there are disproportionate experiences of harms for transgender people.
I was implicitly referring to this exchange:
> > This is provably untrue. > Both of you are correct, you're just looking at probabilities conditioned in the opposite way.
Which you neglected to incorporate into your mental model of this topic.
You seem to be succumbing to a psychological phenomenon called projection.
In fact, you have set up a straw man argument, contrary to HN site guidelines of using the most charitable reading of my original comment, and then inverted your mental model such that you believe I am the one setting up the straw man.
Apart from the insults (accusing me of not liking logic, etc.), this is a straw-man and, just to be clear, is absolutely not what I'm arguing.