Re:Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Ol...
by acituan on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @07:16AM
(#27603135)
My definition says "could produce gametes", not "can have offsprings".
Re intersex; congenital anomalies do not define a category (if the term congenital anomaly offends you, I am using the WHO definition). Just like if we would say "humans have one head" we would be excluding congenital twins, or with "five fingers" we would be excluding polydactyly.
Re intersex; congenital anomalies do not define a category (if the term congenital anomaly offends you, I am using the WHO definition). Just like if we would say "humans have one head" we would be excluding congenital twins, or with "five fingers" we would be excluding polydactyly.