News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Most Dangerous Censorship by cynicalkane on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @05:49PM (#27597658)
> You can cite 100 studies, when you start to argue that women drop out of high stress jobs because they're neurotic you might as well commit seppuku.

I mean, you could characterize this as a problematic presentation, but I'm not sure I'd say presentation is the problem with that sort of statement.

Re:The Most Dangerous Censorship by DSingularity on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @06:37PM (#27598168)
The authors underlying point is that factoring in traits of the population — as described statistically and not anecdotally - is the way to make social structures more inclusive.

For example, let’s say that statistically it was discovered to be that more women prioritize work-life balance over all else. Let’s also assume that you want women to feel included in that little “meritocracy” you created. Is it more or less inclusive that your corporate strategy for promoting favored women who sacrificed their work life balance by working on weekend?

Show me what is wrong with this line of thinking.