News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fasm, a F# to Jitted ASM/IL disassembler as a dotnet tool. Parent comment

Re:Fasm, a F# to Jitted ASM/IL disassembler as a dotnet tool by chalst on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @09:25AM (#27591276)
Agreed. 'Fshasm' would make the connection to F# clearer and avoid this confusion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fasm, a F# to Jitted ASM/IL disassembler as a dotnet tool by aloisdg on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @10:45AM (#27592314)
Fshasm is good idea and available on nuget (https://www.nuget.org/packages?q=Fshasm). We lost the author's wordplay though. I opened an issue on GitHub to talk about the name. Come join us :) https://github.com/d-edge/fasm/issues/5
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fasm, a F# to Jitted ASM/IL disassembler as a dotnet tool by meijer on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @11:50AM (#27593213)
Looks a bit too much like "fascism" for my taste.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fasm, a F# to Jitted ASM/IL disassembler as a dotnet tool by chalst on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @02:23PM (#27595238)
The Levenstein distance to either "Fasm" or "Fshasm" are the same, at three. I don't think that's too close.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fasm, a F# to Jitted ASM/IL disassembler as a dotnet tool by raegis on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @05:03PM (#27597185)
And the distance between "Levenstein" and "Levenshtein" is only one, so is this an OK misspelling? :)
[ Parent | on HN ]