News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing by DavidPiper on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @08:34AM (#27590864)
> putting taxes on electric cars (WHY?!)

This was such a weird move across the board. Climate change rejection aside though, I think there could be a sympathetic (to the government) explanation somewhere in there:

Eventually, EVs will need to be taxed in some way, if only to make up for the loss of fuel excise tax. It's far less controversial (and politically suicidal) to introduce a tax when only a tiny percentage of (presumably non-politically-donating) Australians will actually have to pay it.

Then once EV usage hits a significant percentage, there's already a tax in place that everyone takes for granted. And in the very unlikely event that such a tax would be repealed, what a great card to play at election time.

I can't remember who said it, but it reminds me of the "we should have taxed the Internet when we had the chance" comment. A realisation which came far too late (thankfully) for the government to do anything about it.

Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing by vertis on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @08:48AM (#27590958)
If the AU government didn't have such a denial / fossil-fuels attitude, I could even accept that. Unfortunately, with every other position that they hold it's hard to take that kind of explanation seriously.
Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing by simonblack on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @07:45PM (#27598865)
putting taxes on electric cars (WHY?!)

As a two-edged sword to reduce EV sales.

First edge: to keep the petroleum boys happy.

Second edge: because they can't afford to make the electricity generation plants big enough and the electricity grids robust enough to stand the charging of millions of electric vehicles on a daily basis.