Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing
by hnick on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @06:39AM
(#27590002)
And notice how it's not leaving any marks. I heard it was coated/varnished. Can't have people thinking coal is dirty or anything crazy like that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing
by qwnp on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @07:06AM
(#27590174)
It's hard to tell from images available online, but it may have been anthracite or bituminous coal, which are both surprisingly hard - more like a brittle rock than, say, the charcoal you'd use in a BBQ.
Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing
by hnick on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @07:11AM
(#27590212)
True, this article claims it was varnished but I don't see any evidence for the claim. Regardless, it was a silly stunt but did show his allegiance clearly.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine...
Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing
by dTal on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @07:21AM
(#27590281)
Apparently anthracite is even sometimes used as a gemstone. I've certainly seen ornaments carved out of it.
Re:Australia opposes Great Barrier Reef ′in danger′ listing
by roenxi on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @06:53AM
(#27590095)
I'm don't really see an issue if he did, but it isn't hard to find a good solid sample of coal where all the dust has been brushed off. NSW mines a lot of coal and covers the spectrum of different coal grades.