Re:Haruki Murakami and the Scarcity of Serious Thought
by anonymoushn on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @04:58AM
(#27589443)
Palo Alto, a small town in the largely rural Santa Clara County, etc.
Re:Haruki Murakami and the Scarcity of Serious Thought
by distantaidenn on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @07:50AM
(#27590501)
I used to live in Narashino a little over a decade ago. By no means rural, but definitely a small town compared to one of the Tokyo wards. Also, I wouldn't call it dense at all -- granted, I haven't look at the people/sqm metrics.
Re:Haruki Murakami and the Scarcity of Serious Thought
by dnh44 on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @04:32AM
(#27589324)
It might be a dense suburb now but what was it like 40 years ago when he moved there?
Re:Haruki Murakami and the Scarcity of Serious Thought
by FooHentai on Tuesday June 22, 2021 @04:39AM
(#27589346)
In 1980? Not much different to today. The population then was 125k, today it is about 175k.
Re:Haruki Murakami and the Scarcity of Serious Thought
by dnh44 on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @05:21AM
(#27602483)
Yeah even back then the population density is way higher than anywhere I've ever lived.
However I still take issue with the original argument of:
> just in case anyone was falling for the romantic falsehood this line was selling.
I don't think it's misrepresented anything. The original comment in the article is:
>Narashino, a small town in the largely rural Chiba Prefecture
Whatever it's population density is, 175k people is still a small town.
It's a dense suburb on the outskirts of Tokyo, just in case anyone was falling for the romantic falsehood this line was selling.