News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reproducible. Parent comment

Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu... by schelling42 on Monday June 21, 2021 @05:33AM (#27577614)
How do you know it hasn't been done already? (with a more silent payload than ransomware) /s
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu... by Tabular-Iceberg on Monday June 21, 2021 @07:05AM (#27578050)
What does the /s mean in this context?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu... by Zetaphor on Monday June 21, 2021 @09:55AM (#27579197)
/s is internet parlance to show that the message should be read in a sarcastic tone.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu... by Tabular-Iceberg on Monday June 21, 2021 @10:09AM (#27579319)
Yes, but what confused me is that as far as I can tell we really don’t know that it hasn’t been done before.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nixos-unstable’s ISO_minimal.x86_64-Linux is 100% reprodu... by ghoward on Monday June 21, 2021 @09:45AM (#27579088)
Not GP, but I think it indicates sarcasm?
[ Parent | on HN ]