This doesn't make a lot of logical sense to me.

> natural way that keep population in balance

This is essentially a faith based belief, and not something rooted in personal risk as you previously mentioned.

> All these vaccines are keeping more kindling for a bigger fire down humanity's timeline.

Viral infections don't just kill you or you'll be fine. There are expensive (to society) effects of lots of people having diminished physical and cognitive capacity after infection. More over, by not being vaccinated you are imposing extra risk on anyone you contact who is unlucky enough to be in the narrow slice of people who are vaccinated but still susceptible to infection.

I don't see how you can argue from a perspective of unknown vaccine risk and some sort of concept of needing a virus to kill "excess population." That just seems perverse to me.

I don't need the virus to kill anyone. Its part of the natural world. Viruses are literarily part of our genetic code, and may have helped to evolve the placenta. We have evolved along side of them. They're not there to only harm us, they also benefit us. It doesn't matter what I think anyway.

There's a limit to how much armour you can wear. There's always a cost.

And lets say each vaccine harms you just a tiny bit, which they clearly do. How much is the accumulated damage from all the vaccines we currently take or will need to take into humanity's future vs a naturally evolved immunity.

> And lets say each vaccine harms you just a tiny bit, which they clearly do

I don’t think this is supported by evidence at all.

I have scarring from a TB vaccine on my arm the size of a dime. It's certainly not without effect to have an strong immune response to a foreign substance in your body. I'm not even going to mention the preservatives and other substances they put in them.

The strongest hunch that something is off with an animal population, is a low fertility rate. You have negative, declining reproductive rate hovering around 1.6

> I have scarring from a TB vaccine on my arm the size of a dime.

That isn't some systemic malady, it's a scar. I've got one from cutting myself shaving, but shaving isn't really a problem.

> You have negative, declining reproductive rate hovering around 1.6

This is clearly because people are choosing to have fewer children as they get richer. And is a bizarre point as you earlier argued that the virus killing people was good for "natural balance."

It's really hard to believe you're acting in good faith here and not just trolling.

1. To be comparable, it would be more like you cut yourself shaving, and had a severe infection resulting in a permanent scar on your face the size of a dime.

Evidence is provided of adverse effects here for the US. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

"During this time, VAERS received 5,343 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/ad...

For Canada:

There have been a total of 7,408 reports (26.3 reports per 100,000 doses administered) up to and including June 11, 2021.

https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/

2. That's just one plausible explanation you are given without questioning. It might be true to some extent, but its not the only reason for the decline.

Western Women are not able to have children in large numbers, some are struggling to even have one and are spending thousands of dollars on IVF fertility treatments now into their 40s trying.

"About 10 percent of women (6.1 million) in the United States ages 15-44 have difficulty getting pregnant or staying pregnant, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)."

https://www.womenshealth.gov/a-z-topics/infertility#:~:text=....

This is clearly in bad faith. You've jumped for stating you own fears, to some malthusian nonsense, and now proposing that vaccines lower fertility. You're spewing conspiracy and not acting within the standards of the community. Please take this elsewhere.

You stated that there's no evidence that vaccine harm you even a tiny bit. I provided evidence from the governments own database.

But the thing is that getting vaccinated isn't just a matter of individual safety. It's a way to minimize the spread throughout the whole of society. Even if the death rate would be only 1%, it's a whole lot of unnecessary death when dealing with a large population. Not to mention all the non-lethal yet life altering conditions that may follow full blown COVID.

Regarding your naturalistic argument, I doubt that you have the same outlook when it comes to other aspects of life. There is no shortage of natural causes of death that we try to avoid in our everyday lives. Unless you are proposing that we use COVID as an opportunity to literally and explicitly cull the human population, I don't think that reasoning holds water.

Here's an article of odds of dying from various things.

https://robertroybritt.medium.com/odds-of-dying-what-you-sho...

Car Accidents are around 1/103. I've been to India car Pollution probably kills more.

Will you give up driving to make the roads safer for others? How about just give up google, because apparently they paid for some of the GOF research labs.

If you truly believe that viruses are here to keep our population in balance and we should be part of natural world, why would higher chances of dying affect your decision? Following your logic it just means that nature have much stronger reasons to decimate humanity. Shouldn’t you accept it?