Re:Life as a public school teacher in the San Francisco Bay ...
by A4ET8a8uTh0 on Sunday June 20, 2021 @10:06AM
(#27570103)
But isn't it a good thing where birds of feather flock together? Just not being dragged down from low scoring kids is worth it. Why can't they select for criteria they are looking for?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Life as a public school teacher in the San Francisco Bay ...
by teachrdan on Monday June 21, 2021 @02:02PM
(#27581811)
In practice this means discriminating against students who are non-native English speakers, students with learning disabilities, etc.
> Just not being dragged down from low scoring kids is worth it.
It depends on the kind of society you want to live in. I would rather live in a society that prioritizes decreasing inequality rather than exacerbating it.
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/success-academy-charter-sc...
Re:Life as a public school teacher in the San Francisco Bay ...
by throwaway894345 on Monday June 21, 2021 @03:57PM
(#27583587)
I could equally (and accurately) argue that in practice public school means discriminating against people by wealth, using zip code as a proxy.
And anyway, why would "discriminating based on competence" exacerbate inequality? Shouldn't competence-based discrimination lessen inequality e.g. by giving bright, poorer schools a shot at more prestigious institutions while financially-but-not-intellectually privileged kids move to more middling institutions?
Given the choice between wealth discrimination and merit discrimination, I would prefer the latter.