Re:U.S. senators propose 25% tax credit for semiconductor ma...
by cinquemb on Sunday June 20, 2021 @02:34AM
(#27567703)
> This is interesting to imagine, but how?
I ask the same question too, because when people speculate on computing:
> security of the present value of future property rents
often
> replacement cost of tangible industrial capital, structures, plant, and equipment values
Are often included included in the models because often this is the collateral that can actually have a liquid market value in the event of liquidation, but this is also subject to market conditions at the time this needs to be liquidated and the cost of actually liquidating.
Not to mention it would lower loan values since other non tangibles are often considered (IP, investor sentiment on corporate managers executing any given strategy, market conditions, etc).
When you say “ Then by using financial regulations to require loans which expand quantity of legal tender in circulation to be issued on security of the replacement cost of tangible industrial capital, structures, plant, and equipment values rather than on security of the present value of future property rents.”
This is interesting to imagine, but how? (Sorry if it’s a stupid-obvious question, but I am earnest in asking it. Perhaps I am stupid tonight.) I could certainly see regulation to kill the “future rents/superprofits industry” but not quite sure how to require loans for ... call it the future-tangible-industry-industry? Also sorry this question is formulated in such a round about way.
Gleeful aside: Me thinks the status quo elite would not like it. ;)
Finally; I am happy to do research -> how might you suggest I google my way into this viewpoint most directly?