Re:Mathematicians welcome computer-assisted proof in ‘grand ...
by Someody42 on Saturday June 19, 2021 @04:11PM
(#27563994)
You can absolutely do constructive things in Lean, as long as you use neither the built-in "quot" type nor the three other axioms described in the docs, and then you get a system with all the desired properties I think
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mathematicians welcome computer-assisted proof in ‘grand ...
by foooobar on Saturday June 19, 2021 @04:18PM
(#27564061)
Some constructivists may also take offense with proof irrelevance (and the resulting loss of normalization [1] or its incompatibility with HoTT), which you can only really avoid by avoiding Prop.
Re:Mathematicians welcome computer-assisted proof in ‘grand ...
by xvilka on Saturday June 19, 2021 @11:21PM
(#27566824)
There is also a problem of HoTT and equality reflection incompatibility[1].
[1] https://www2.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~streicher/barc_corr...