News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mathematicians welcome computer-assisted proof in ‘grand ... by Someody42 on Saturday June 19, 2021 @04:11PM (#27563994)
You can absolutely do constructive things in Lean, as long as you use neither the built-in "quot" type nor the three other axioms described in the docs, and then you get a system with all the desired properties I think
Re:Mathematicians welcome computer-assisted proof in ‘grand ... by foooobar on Saturday June 19, 2021 @04:18PM (#27564061)
Some constructivists may also take offense with proof irrelevance (and the resulting loss of normalization [1] or its incompatibility with HoTT), which you can only really avoid by avoiding Prop.

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08174

Re:Mathematicians welcome computer-assisted proof in ‘grand ... by xvilka on Saturday June 19, 2021 @11:21PM (#27566824)
There is also a problem of HoTT and equality reflection incompatibility[1].

[1] https://www2.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~streicher/barc_corr...