Aspiring to build a reserve currency? A reserve currency is something for banks to use. Bitcoin's excitement was as a p2p cash that needs no banks and no reserve.
A reserve is something held by a political state. Bitcoin is exciting becauee it exists beyond politics and nation-states.
If this is news for you, go read the original bitcoin paper. Its title is "Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash."
I wasn't aware Bitcoin-the-protocol could prevent banks, companies, and countries from buying and hodling Bitcoin. Maybe, Bitcoin is whatever its users say it is. Maybe you should reread the paper.
Re:Verkle Trees
by X6S1x6Okd1st on Saturday June 19, 2021 @02:32AM
(#27558299)
I don't believe strongly in the global reserve currency framework.
I also don't think that the current tech can accomplish much of what I was hoping Bitcoin could accomplish.
If the goal is just to increase adoption given the current tech then I'm out, there's more interesting things to pay/give attention to.
If they're aspiring to build a global reserve currency, then why shouldn't their first priority be increased adoption? Distribution matters more than tech if the tech is already good enough.
Also, you seem to have contradicted yourself -- increased adoption begets growth.