Re:DenoDB
by TranquilMarmot on Sunday June 20, 2021 @12:41PM
(#27571683)
From the same base tables. And yes, it is very incompatible with the definition of a microservice and causes plenty of horrible issues.
I didn't say it was good architecture. It's a remnant of when we were a startup in "move fast break things" mode (we have since been acquired) and as an org paying down tech debt has never been a priority so we're left with a lot of bad decisions that we have to live with (to the point where it's a miracle when we actually ship any meaningful features...)
Like, all from the same base tables or each with their own schema with service-specific views? Also, isn't shared-DB integration by-definition incompatible with “microservices”, which are isolated and sovereign over their own data?