News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When pop history bombs: a response to Malcolm Gladwell by temp8964 on Wednesday June 16, 2021 @06:51PM (#27534392)
"single variable explains success"? It is not what it about.
Re:When pop history bombs: a response to Malcolm Gladwell by ekianjo on Wednesday June 16, 2021 @06:58PM (#27534453)
Its exactly that when you keep saying 10 000 hours is a magic number.
Re:When pop history bombs: a response to Malcolm Gladwell by temp8964 on Wednesday June 16, 2021 @07:13PM (#27534565)
Wow. Do you think it is exactly 10 000 hours? It is exactly 10 000 hours for everyone? I don't understand this kind of nonsensical interpretation.
Re:When pop history bombs: a response to Malcolm Gladwell by TameAntelope on Wednesday June 16, 2021 @07:12PM (#27534555)
I would argue that 10,000 hours is represented as an inflection point in his book, more as a, "This number, with one significant digit, kept showing up when Gladwell would interview people who were great at specific things" instead of a, "do this amount of a specific thing and you'll then be great at that specific thing" or "magic" number in that sense.

It's hardly a steadfast rule and he never presents it as such, but it's easy to squint real hard and see it that way, if you just want to argue or be upset.

Re:When pop history bombs: a response to Malcolm Gladwell by drewcoo on Wednesday June 16, 2021 @11:37PM (#27535918)
It's not a magic number so much as an attempt to redefine expertise. While shilling a self-help book. A lie at the kernel of a con.