News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead by jamwt on Monday July 11, 2011 @04:36PM (#2752414)
Which is to say indirectly that I think the right answer is for nginx (and daemons generally) to support the PROXY protocol, or some other agreed-upon standard for a naive upstream proxy to indicate host/port information.
Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead by sciurus on Monday July 11, 2011 @10:30PM (#2753299)
Could someone link to a description of the PROXY protocol?
Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead by stock_toaster on Tuesday July 19, 2011 @10:40PM (#2784081)
Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead by stock_toaster on Monday July 11, 2011 @07:15PM (#2752871)
I really agree with this. I think keeping stud as simple as possible is a great goal.