Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead
by jamwt on Monday July 11, 2011 @04:36PM
(#2752414)
Which is to say indirectly that I think the right answer is for nginx (and daemons generally) to support the PROXY protocol, or some other agreed-upon standard for a naive upstream proxy to indicate host/port information.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead
by sciurus on Monday July 11, 2011 @10:30PM
(#2753299)
Could someone link to a description of the PROXY protocol?
Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead
by stock_toaster on Tuesday July 19, 2011 @10:40PM
(#2784081)
Re:Nginx sucks at SSL, here's what to do instead
by stock_toaster on Monday July 11, 2011 @07:15PM
(#2752871)
I really agree with this.
I think keeping stud as simple as possible is a great goal.