Re:A strong commitment to backwards compatibility means keep...
by jnxx on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @02:07PM
(#27519203)
> And not keeping the old API around incurs work, potentially a lot, for everyone using the thing - transitively.
Not only that, but breaking backwards compatibility will cause dependency conflicts once a dependency graph is a bit larger, and this can easily completely stall transitioning of software to a new version.
Not only that, but breaking backwards compatibility will cause dependency conflicts once a dependency graph is a bit larger, and this can easily completely stall transitioning of software to a new version.