News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on NIH study offers new evidence of early SARS-CoV-2 infections in U.S.. Parent comment

Re:NIH study offers new evidence of early SARS-CoV-2 infecti... by javagram on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @01:49PM (#27518892)
Hey, that’s my post :-D I think it still holds up. The virus being “present” in the US in December isn’t the same as being spread widely.

This new NIH survey still offers no reason to doubt the timeline that the virus emerged around October 2019 in Wuhan and only became a serious threat in late November/December, when hospitalizations began to rise and some doctors started warning of a SARS re-emergence. A widespread COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan during August 2019 continues to seem unlikely to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NIH study offers new evidence of early SARS-CoV-2 infecti... by Gibbon1 on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @02:26PM (#27519494)
What I remember was people arguing that it was present earlier where also making the argument that infection was widespread. And thus the case fatality ratio was 100 times lower than the 0.7% the Chinese were reporting.
[ Parent | on HN ]