News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Coq mulls new name for programming language by thewakalix on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @06:54AM (#27513463)
(Potentially-relevant fact: I am a woman.)

I first heard of Coq in a CS lecture, and it wasn’t at all off-putting. The professor included the obligatory “yes the name sounds funny” disclaimer and then presented an interesting walkthrough of Coq. I haven’t used Coq myself yet, but that has more to do with the difficulty of starting than the name. I’ve enjoyed the Natural Number Game (a web-based set of Lean exercises), as a good example of something which actually helps people get into theorem proving. This debate over the name of Coq is just an instance of the Law of Triviality.

Re:Coq mulls new name for programming language by angry_octet on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @02:43PM (#27519713)
While you may not have felt that way, other women have. Does your experience invalidate theirs?
Re:Coq mulls new name for programming language by thewakalix on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @08:18PM (#27523321)
No, I’m just providing my own n=1.

(Why is it that “I am unhappy” is justified to report, but “I am alright” isn’t? Don’t we want a representative sample of opinions?)

Re:Coq mulls new name for programming language by angry_octet on Tuesday June 15, 2021 @11:19PM (#27524520)
It's perfectly fine, and in mature settings it should be a non-issue. But I've learnt to be wary of assuming everyone is fine with it, or assuming that everyone will behave. I mean, tech bros will tech bro. I'm not in favour of helping them perform deniable harassment.