News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stripe Identity by lotsofpulp on Monday June 14, 2021 @02:28PM (#27506300)
Is this a discussion about the architecture of the web? Or about specific websites? If Costco wants me to login to their website to buy things, or Facebook wants me to use real identity, that does not stop me from using alternatives that do not.

Am I entitled to alternatives that do not verify identity? Maybe the operating costs are too high?

Re:Stripe Identity by danShumway on Monday June 14, 2021 @02:31PM (#27506350)
Your proposal is for a government-run identity verification system.

The "we" in this context (ordinary users) also comprise the majority of voters and regulators who will ultimately decide how the system you propose is built and what restrictions it will have; and that is a group that is not solely motivated by your business interests -- so it is kind of important for you to be able to convince them that your system benefits them, and not just a few businesses.

Why should a Congressperson vote to build the system you propose instead of introducing a harsh privacy law that restricts which businesses are allowed to collect identification?

Re:Stripe Identity by lotsofpulp on Monday June 14, 2021 @02:53PM (#27506649)
I think we can do both. Or at least restrict what a business can do with identification information that is mandatory, such as not being able to use it for marketing purposes or sold, and have it be temporary.
Re:Stripe Identity by Nextgrid on Monday June 14, 2021 @03:19PM (#27506981)
> Facebook wants me to use real identity

We're already living in a world where you have to "login with Facebook" to do many things, but at the very least you can currently still create a fake account if you have no other option. If reliable identity verification starts becoming commonplace, that option goes away.