> This is the first time I've heard that "Scientific Linux"
"Then you haven't followed the linux distros (especially RHEL binary compatible clones) close enough. SL is actually older than CentOS."
I was trying to explain that your average Linux sysadmin is aware of RHEL and Centos, but not "Scientific Linux". That's all. I stand by that statement.
"Then you haven't followed the linux distros (especially RHEL binary compatible clones) close enough. SL is actually older than CentOS."
I was trying to explain that your average Linux sysadmin is aware of RHEL and Centos, but not "Scientific Linux". That's all. I stand by that statement.