Re:Rust 1.x seems to not always be backward compatible in pr...
by gspr on Sunday June 13, 2021 @11:32AM
(#27493420)
It's not a problem with mature languages though.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rust 1.x seems to not always be backward compatible in pr...
by jen20 on Sunday June 13, 2021 @01:33PM
(#27494449)
Depending on what you consider “mature”, sure. Here is a short list of programming languages where I have had to install an up-to-date version on recent Debian, Ubuntu or RHEL derivatives in just the last month:
- Node.js
- Python
- Go
- Rust
- C++
- .NET Core
- Java
None had an up-to-date version in the distribution repositories. It’s a problem - and for those who defend it as otherwise while lamenting the rise of Docker, perhaps it’s worth some careful introspection about what a majority of people actually want from an operating system distribution, and whether the concept is in fact a relic of the days when software was distributed on CDs via the mail.
Re:Rust 1.x seems to not always be backward compatible in pr...
by gspr on Monday June 14, 2021 @03:00AM
(#27500048)
Really? For what reason did you have to install a newer Python, a newer C++ compiler, or a newer Java runtime?
> None had an up-to-date version in the distribution repositories.
Of course not. A Debian release is meant to not change – except for security fixes – for the duration of its 2 year cycle. That's a feature, not a bug.