This is illogical.
Humans have been eating animals since the dawn of civilization. We've been using animals in experiments for centuries.
There are still animals to eat and use in experiments. Why? because animals reproduce. There aren't a fixed number of animals.
We only lose species when we kill faster then they reproduce. For experiments and food, that's an impossibility. We bread to accommodate demand.
But our ethics progress and evolve. Similarly, treating other species as commodities for our consumption has been done for millennia but it doesn't mean we should keep doing it.
Is that not a contradiction? When you find yourself thinking that the majority of humans are the abnormal ones...
This definition of insanity might also not be correct. After all, was Galileo insane because most people (assuming they followed the church) didn't agree with his views?
As much as it is necessary.
That is insane, and psychopathic. But it is shared by many (most?) humans. The result will be that there will be no animals left, and soon afterwards, no humans left either.
Another question is, how many humans are you willing to sacrifice to save your wife? Your child? Is your child worth a specific number of human lives, in your eyes? And what is that number?