News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome abandons 'simplified domain experiment' in omnibar by charsi on Saturday June 12, 2021 @12:59AM (#27481669)
Yep this flow is ripe for phishing. But I prefer it over just giving a card number that a merchant has the ability to store and eventually leak.

With bank payments I just have to be careful to check I am actually at the bank website when entering the login info. Makes me feel more in control.

I guess people in the west were already used to giving out their card info over the phone to make purchases so wasn't a big deal when online sites started doing it. In India credit cards were still not wide spread (still aren't) in the early 2000s.

Re:Chrome abandons 'simplified domain experiment' in omnibar by logifail on Saturday June 12, 2021 @03:21PM (#27486832)
> I prefer it over just giving a card number that a merchant has the ability to store and eventually leak

Even if you know that your card provider will refund you if the card leaks?

In the last decade I've twice had a credit card cloned, and twice I've been pleasantly surprised how quickly the card provider a) detected the issue, b) blocked the old card and re-issued a new card, and c) refunded the fraudent transactions.

Based on that, I'd trust my credit card provider far more than my bank(s).

Re:Chrome abandons 'simplified domain experiment' in omnibar by Cu3PO42 on Saturday June 12, 2021 @04:12PM (#27487137)
Which cards are you using? AMEX? For the most commonly accepted schemes in Europe, i.e., Visa and MasterCard, requesting a chargeback typically goes through your card issuer which almost always is your bank.
Re:Chrome abandons 'simplified domain experiment' in omnibar by logifail on Sunday June 13, 2021 @10:21AM (#27492836)
> requesting a chargeback

Don't chargebanks typically involve a dispute between buyer and merchant? In neither of the instances where I personally experienced card fraud was the typical chargeback process involked, both times I had to confirm which recent transasctions were and weren't "mine", and after that the card provider did all the running. The second time I had many thousands of euros of fraudulent transactions refunded onto my account within 48h of the fraud being detected by the card issuer.

> your card issuer which almost always is your bank

Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I trust how credit-card-issuing-banks (in my case it was Barclaycard ie Barclays PLC) treat their card customers more than I trust current/checking/giro account banks treat _their_ customers.

It makes a lot of sense when you think about the underlying incentives to treat customers well.

Changing your current/checking/giro account can take quite a lot of work and has the potential to cause problems for a long time.

Applying for a new credit card takes a few minutes and the entire process is complete in a few days.