Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by notJim on Friday June 11, 2021 @05:32PM
(#27478774)
This is maybe a ridiculous question, but why is that so much better? If someone is able to live cheaply, why is it better for them to work in some menial, low-wage job versus being supported by a relative? I think something you have to consider is that if you have low social standing and are poorly educated, your options in life are not necessarily super appealing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by Vadoff on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:44PM
(#27479419)
Who's to say that they'd remain in low-wage job? They may be wildly wealthy in the future. It's hard to know, since their potential is being squandered by the parents enabling this behavior.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by wyre on Friday June 11, 2021 @07:28PM
(#27479755)
What avenues would they have to realize their potential? College is obscenely expensive, a degree from a community college is afaik useless, rent prices are bonkers, and the job market for those without a degree is wage slavery.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by imtringued on Friday June 11, 2021 @07:44PM
(#27479879)
I am suspecting that because of the lack of full employment a degree is just a hack to get first in line for the jobs that the economy is resentfully providing. If companies couldn't find enough workers they'd lower standards and offer training. It's precisely because they can find all the workers they could hope for that we have put the burden of training onto workers.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by Noos on Saturday June 12, 2021 @10:31AM
(#27484744)
Yeah, one of my fears is we simply have too many people and too few jobs in this kind of economy. The lower birth rates are a gaia consciousness response to overpopulation in this respect
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by ericd on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:45PM
(#27481335)
It's interesting that you don't mention trade schools and then apprenticeship. That's where I'd look, personally, and my impression is that people in the trades can make bank, especially if they eventually set up their own business.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by Noos on Saturday June 12, 2021 @10:30AM
(#27484737)
not really, there's only so many tradesmen an area can support, and only union members get any real standard of living. Plus, there's the whole "destroying your body" thing; it's not computer scientists behind the opioid crisis, for example. Its drudgery, extremely hard work, and with a side order of ill health for the rest of your life.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by ericd on Saturday June 12, 2021 @12:09PM
(#27485390)
Contractors are doing extremely well right now/are in extremely high demand, and I’m pretty sure union membership isn’t a requirement there…
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by nradov on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:18PM
(#27479177)
If you have time to play video games then you have time to improve your education and social standing. Wealthy relatives don't live forever.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by throwaway306744 on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:49PM
(#27481363)
Consider that the limited resource may be mental, not temporal.
We don't expect everyone to be able to run a 10-minute mile, even though most people can. Likewise we shouldn't expect everyone to be able to hold down a 40+ hour-a-week job and "functional adult" life, even though most people can.
Re:Fewer young men are in the labor force, more are living a...
by the_only_law on Sunday June 13, 2021 @11:27AM
(#27493382)
You might have the time, but probably not the money.