News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by paulpauper on Friday June 11, 2021 @01:10PM (#27475914)
I have observed that purported STEMlordery is more of myth than reality, or a caricature created by the media. I have found that on many stem-centric communities that people employed in STEM have great respect for the humanities, such as history, philosophy, or writing. Look at how many non-STEM articles get voted to the top of hacker news, such as articles about literature or philosophy.
Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by dash2 on Friday June 11, 2021 @04:06PM (#27477809)
Personally I love literature and art, my bedroom is lined with poetry books in several languages, and for that very reason, I dislike much of the modern humanities, with their pious, dreary approach to these beautiful and important things.
Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by BeFlatXIII on Friday June 11, 2021 @08:51PM (#27480299)
> I dislike much of the modern humanities with their pious, dreary approach

As someone who recovered from a mild case of being a STEMlord in college, grandiose claims of unearned self-importance are what turned me off from literature classes. I was always down to take a class in history, philosophy, or music if my schedule had an opening for that semester, but I took the minimum I could get away with in languages & literature.

Part of the problem is that English departments insist they are important because they “teach you how to be fully human”, which induces eye rolls: it’s like how the Quality Inn having the word “quality” in its name is unintentionally ironic. I still don’t know if the Dead Poets Society was meant as a satire of self-important literature classes or as a genuine homage to them.

At least the way it was taught when I was in high school, poetry was either cheesy rhymes or was the literary equivalent of debugging someone else’s code golf. It wasn’t until I discovered the authors Mark Danielewski and Christian Bök that I understood the joy in playing with language for its own sake.

Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by quartesixte on Saturday June 12, 2021 @01:24AM (#27481778)
History based English departments might have been more up your alley.

Took a class on Shakespeare centered around recreating the plays as they were meant to be played, and the historical context they were played in. Fascinating stuff, and a lot less susceptible to pure rhetorical analysis nonsense.

Re:Incentives in economics are wrong, but how? by BeFlatXIII on Friday June 11, 2021 @02:19PM (#27476775)
Undergraduate underclassmen and high school students are where you find most real live STEM lords. STEM professionals may be ignorant of the humanities, but they are (for the vast majority) no longer condescendingly dismissive enough to be true STEM lords.