[dead]
Re:The Queen’s Latin or Who Were the Romans? Part I: Beginni...
by legutierr on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:40AM
(#27471533)
Come again? Frescoes are not evidence?
You should know that you’re not making a very strong historical argument when part of your argument is “Ignore these primary sources.”
[dead]
Re:The Queen’s Latin or Who Were the Romans? Part I: Beginni...
by legutierr on Friday June 11, 2021 @07:23AM
(#27471807)
Your reasoning is haphazard. Where did I say anything about not wanting sources, about leftism, or about any black Roman senator? Who are you arguing with?
Re:The Queen’s Latin or Who Were the Romans? Part I: Beginni...
by uniqueid on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:18AM
(#27471382)
I'll stick with mainstream sources.
Re:The Queen’s Latin or Who Were the Romans? Part I: Beginni...
by greenwich26 on Friday June 11, 2021 @06:34AM
(#27471502)
>Edit: Come to think of it, also there were also a few Roman Emperors from North Africa!
North Africa, like most of the Mediterranean, was white in Roman times. North Africa is only swarthy today in the aftermath of Arab conquest in the 7th and 8th centuries.
Re:The Queen’s Latin or Who Were the Romans? Part I: Beginni...
by Mediterraneo10 on Friday June 11, 2021 @07:39AM
(#27471932)
This isn’t remotely true. The Berber-speaking population of North Africa, i.e. the autochtonous population that was living there before the Arab invasion (and, of course, before Roman influence) is generally swarthier than those who can demonstrate pure Arab descent.
Edit: Come to think of it, also there were also a few Roman Emperors from North Africa!