Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by bradlys on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @11:44PM (#27456439)

10 remote is a bit excessive.

You only need like 3 to hit $1.5m and that’s far more manageable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by speedgoose on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:11AM (#27456890)

Where are these remote jobs paying 500k?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by rcpt on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:59AM (#27457266)

Obviously holding down 3 staff engineer jobs at FANG. No problem. Everyone's doing it now c'mon ya doofus

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by Vadoff on Thursday June 10, 2021 @06:37AM (#27459115)

Even top of band senior pay can do $500k at FANG.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by danilocesar on Friday June 11, 2021 @10:13AM (#27473614)

I guarantee you that you won't "get by" at a FANG doing bare minimum for more than a month.

Also, I doubt anyone doing this kind of work will get get a second FANG work after failing the first.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by bradlys on Thursday June 10, 2021 @02:32AM (#27457528)

I figure 3 Big N is comparable to 10 other remote orgs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by ping_pong on Thursday June 10, 2021 @01:16PM (#27463076)

They would have to last 1 year to get the full TC which isn't the point. They do the minimal amount of work to collect a $150k salary and then get fired in 4 months and move on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook extends its work-at-home policy to most employees by madorb on Thursday June 10, 2021 @10:41AM (#27461311)

no way does this lead to anyone being anyplace long enough to actually vest.

[ Parent | on HN ]