News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by tialaramex on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @10:47AM (#27448507)
The Party can have whatever rules it wants. If it should even prefer for its leader to be a Hampster, it can do that.

As you might expect the political parties in the UK are organised differently according to their principles, so the Labour Party is an unincorporated association which only owns companies for purposes for which an informal group would be illegal (e.g. "People who come to our meetings" cannot legally own a plot of land, but "Labour Party Meetings Limited" could) while whatever the current Nigel Farage vehicle is (Reform? Brexit Party? Whatever he's calling it now) is a private company entirely owned and controlled by Nigel and his friends.

Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by chrisseaton on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @10:51AM (#27448560)
> The Party can have whatever rules it wants.

Not sure what point you're trying to make. Yes they can have whatever rules they want... and the rule they want is that the leader must be a commoner MP.

Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by vidarh on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @12:22PM (#27449761)
But Labours rules prevents him from being leader without being an MP.

Labour could change that, but if they were to be changed, it would not be for Sadiq Khan. Maybe for Andy Burnham. Khan doesn't have enough support among Labour members. Realistically it won't be changed for either, as it would cause too many difficulties.