News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by lbriner on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @08:00AM (#27446905)
This isn't really the argument though. Sure, we want a member of staff to help but they could be a £30K train manager instead of a £70K driver.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by e17 on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @08:04AM (#27446931)
As the article explains, the train managers will strike just the same as drivers do, leaving us in exactly the same situation as before.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by yardstick on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @08:35AM (#27447179)
Not exactly the same situation. Less wages to pay, less pension debts to fund.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by e17 on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @10:23AM (#27448203)
If there are still strikes then it is the same situation. Your plan solves nothing, for reasons both the article and I have outlined already. If we put you in charge tomorrow to execute your plan of moving from £70k drivers to £30k hi-vis vest-wearers, you would cause weeks of strikes, massive disruption and solve nothing.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by yardstick on Thursday June 10, 2021 @03:02AM (#27457745)
One of cost of a few weeks of strikes to reduce cost of drivers by over half? Sign me up. Also the unions strikes are selfish in nature, they all team up to support one another to keep remuneration artificially high by holding the transport system to ransom anytime sometime tries correct it. The Tube Mafia would be a more apt name.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by pydry on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @11:35AM (#27449147)
How badly paid do you want the people responsible for your safety to be?
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by i_am_andy on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @12:10PM (#27449575)
A 30K train manager is still more than a 25K bus driver.

And there are a lot more road accidents than train accidents.