News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by crimsoneer on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @07:31AM (#27446685)
This. London's tube system is essentially stopped a day or so a year due to strikes, which is pretty dramatic for a city of 10 million people who rely on it.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by vidarh on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @07:48AM (#27446804)
Most strikes affecting the underground have not been just drivers, so making the system driverless would be unlikely to change that.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by Zenst on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @09:19AM (#27447532)
True, and been over safty concerns/reduction in safty staff.

Though: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-19741282

Nicely sums up how the whole driveless tube/train aspect has been rumbling on for a while now.

Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by teachingassist on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @07:59AM (#27446888)
London's transport strikes have been shown to ultimately benefit the wider economy, as people have broken out of their local maximums and found more efficient ways to travel around.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by BurningFrog on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @10:01AM (#27447915)
That you can identify a benefit doesn't mean it's outweighing the costs.
Re:The myth of the driverless tube train by speapr on Wednesday June 09, 2021 @11:18AM (#27448917)
Perhaps the drivers should be paid a sum of money which closer reflects how much marginal value they add to the city, and this would convince them not to strike.