News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Real-world CSS vs. CSS-in-JS performance comparison. Parent comment

Re:Real-world CSS vs. CSS-in-JS performance comparison by hudixt on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @04:20PM (#27440232)
Added one more point on API. Also, you'll probably end up using one more library called classname for better classname management.

https://www.npmjs.com/package/classnames

In the end, I generally prefer to use tailwind + emotion. My goals usually is to save time and make system more consistent rather than perf gains, which isn't that much on new systems.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Real-world CSS vs. CSS-in-JS performance comparison by nicoburns on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @04:28PM (#27440328)
Indeed. Worth noting that classnames is a tiny library.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Real-world CSS vs. CSS-in-JS performance comparison by lhnz on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @04:43PM (#27440509)
I've heard that `clsx` is faster: https://github.com/lukeed/clsx
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Real-world CSS vs. CSS-in-JS performance comparison by nicoburns on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @05:19PM (#27440982)
Looks like a well designed library (and it is only 40 lines long - but then the original isn't much bigger). But it's hard for me to imagine code where this is a bottleneck.
[ Parent | on HN ]