Re:We are publishing the tax secrets of the .001%
by itsoktocry on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @11:00AM
(#27436073)
>So evidence obtained illegally outside of due-process is fair game in your book?
So evidence of horrible crimes should be ignored if subjective "due-process" isn't followed? You do realize that the moneyed elite have disproportionate influence over "process" and law, right?
Focus on the leaks and whether they are true, not the messenger.
Re:We are publishing the tax secrets of the .001%
by bko on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @12:04PM
(#27436976)
The "horrible crimes" of following the applicable tax laws. Got it.
I'm not focusing on the messenger. I'm questioning the ethics to violate the privacy of private individuals to try to score political points.
Re:We are publishing the tax secrets of the .001%
by aaron-santos on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @03:11PM
(#27439504)
You're not advocating for modeling our actions, social interactions, behaviours, and relationships after our criminal justice system, right? Also you're not advocating for an equivalentcy between judicial evidenciary procedure and information gathering, and judicial due process and social due process, right?
I guess by saying "when due process failed" kind of makes it so since by definition it "failed".