News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Notepad++ drops Bing after “tank man” censorship by bigwavedave on Monday June 07, 2021 @05:38PM (#27427375)
> That's because Microsoft got caught censoring the results, then they lied and claimed it was a "human error," which absolutely nobody believes.

Oh, I don't know. If we can label "accidentally using the wrong scope" as a human error, I could easily see a situation where someone meant to remove something from Chinese search results but accidentally did it worldwide. I don't know what their infrastructure is like, what kind of safeguards they have in place, or even what they do to block a result from the all-seeing algorithm. Which is more likely: that Microsoft would allow China to dictate what the rest of the world can/cannot see or that someone made a mistake and blocked something globally instead of regionally?

Re:Notepad++ drops Bing after “tank man” censorship by relativ575 on Monday June 07, 2021 @06:03PM (#27427710)
I find it baffled that a company of that caliber don't have regression tests that can verify region-bound changes wouldn't affect results intended for other regions.
Re:Notepad++ drops Bing after “tank man” censorship by true_religion on Tuesday June 08, 2021 @01:52PM (#27438529)
It was a mistake not an accident. When you make an accident, test safety checks can save you.

However although you don’t intentionally make a mistake, you do intentionally carry it out.

In that case, no amount of safety checking will stop a human being from implementing bad logic.

Re:Notepad++ drops Bing after “tank man” censorship by kbenson on Monday June 07, 2021 @08:06PM (#27428991)
If someone accidentally didn't scope the change as region bound, what makes you think they couldn't accidentally scope the test wrong the same way?

Human error knows no bounds.