Let me make it easy for you: if you throw a firebomb at the cop car, it's not justified.

Q: If someone causes damage to my property by emitting greenhouse gases, am I entitled to defend my property by shooting them?

Thanks for providing your rationale.

I reject it. NAP is an extraordinarily convenient and frequent cover for genocide, and arguably arose from just that basis.

Would that have been equally true in late-1930s Germany (or Russia, for that matter)?

Call me from late 1930s Germany and we'll discuss it.

Take it as presumed that a questioner has a direct link to the side of the state or the opposition, or both, of 1930s Germany, and answer the question rather than dodge it.

It's not 1930s Germany, throwing a firebomb at the cop car out of hysteria is not justified.

It somewhat weakens an absolute assertion "X is not justified" when a response 1) lists numerous current or recent instances in which X is argued as justified by a substantial groiup, and the further response 2) boils down to "now is not one of those times in which X is justified".

A chief weapon of both tyrant and bully is to deny their victims and targets the right to self-defence.