News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The case for continuous documentation by prepend on Sunday June 06, 2021 @08:38AM (#27412744)
It still works ok, just not as nicely.

The copy editor updates the repo and while their changes won’t be in the same commit, they should be nearby.

So you still get the benefit of docs history, and being in the same place.

Re:The case for continuous documentation by skeeter2020 on Sunday June 06, 2021 @09:05AM (#27412874)
I think you could also make a case that if you've adopted these strict documentation requirements you don't decouple the functional commits from the documentation commits. Your copy editor could work in the same branch as the code changes and then you only approve the PR when the documentation is at the same level of QA as the code. Otherwise a fear separate commits or branches is the thin edge of the wedge.