News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild ... by roseway4 on Friday June 04, 2021 @08:19PM (#27400711)
The March attestation was published 5/24 (the day prior to that article) and is available on the Centre website[1]. It doesn’t appear there’s cause for alarm in this case.

[1] https://www.centre.io/hubfs/pdfs/attestation/grant-thorton_c...

Re:Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild ... by Marazan on Saturday June 05, 2021 @04:33AM (#27403299)
Except the attestations have stopped saying how much cash they have in their accounts and now just say that Cricle _claim_ they have enough assets to cover the liabilities.

This is a HUGE change and massively cause for alarm.

Re:Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild ... by antb123 on Saturday June 05, 2021 @10:53AM (#27405548)
Probably no depositor insurance but whatever.
Re:Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild ... by jhanschoo on Saturday June 05, 2021 @09:27AM (#27404807)
Note that apparently attestations just validate that a certain bank account had a certain number at a certain time, which obviously does not account for loan obligations. In Tether's case

> https://www.singlelunch.com/2021/05/19/the-tether-ponzi-sche...

> [Tether was] Failing to complete an audit and settling on an attestation “for transparency”. The morning of the attestation, tether moved $380m from sister company bitfinex into a bank account to pass the verification