Re:Intel and AMD Contemplate Different Replacements for x86 ...
by coldtea on Friday June 04, 2021 @05:49PM
(#27399465)
>Just because a technology is "old" doesn't mean it is useless, or needs to be replaced.
Sure. But if on top of old it is "a creaking wheezing ironmonger" that "had the gods of microprocessor architecture been more generous, would have been smote into oblivion long ago", then it does need to be replaced.
And both the article mentions reasons why (they don't stop at mere old) and Intel/AMD share them.
Sure. But if on top of old it is "a creaking wheezing ironmonger" that "had the gods of microprocessor architecture been more generous, would have been smote into oblivion long ago", then it does need to be replaced.
And both the article mentions reasons why (they don't stop at mere old) and Intel/AMD share them.