Re:Stanford law student who made fun of the federalist able ...
by krapp on Thursday June 03, 2021 @11:38AM
(#27382955)
>Additionally, the flyer about Black Lives Matter could equally well be a talk.
And if it were, it might hypothetically have been tolerated.
However, "Black lives matter mostly peaceful arson and riot" doesn't describe a talk, it describes an arson and riot. Claims that Stanford reacting differently to the two would merely be due to political bias is disingenuous projection.
Maybe GP intended to describe a satirical talk exactly like the one in the OP, but they didn't, and their language entirely undercut the premise of their attempted argument.
And if it were, it might hypothetically have been tolerated.
However, "Black lives matter mostly peaceful arson and riot" doesn't describe a talk, it describes an arson and riot. Claims that Stanford reacting differently to the two would merely be due to political bias is disingenuous projection.
Maybe GP intended to describe a satirical talk exactly like the one in the OP, but they didn't, and their language entirely undercut the premise of their attempted argument.