News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:G7 nations committing billions more to fossil fuel than g... by ashtonkem on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @09:12AM (#27368271)
Counterpoint, while it’s true we still use things like coal, what we do with them has changed massively. Coal in the 1850s was all about metal working, steam production (train and ship), and home heating, uses that have been almost entirely replaced. Coal fired power plants came surprisingly later, with most units coming online in America between 1910 and 1950, a time in which trains and ships largely went electric or to diesel.

Also, our history of energy production is very short. I’d be disinclined to say that it’s impossible based on a mere 200 year sample.

Re:G7 nations committing billions more to fossil fuel than g... by gregwebs on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @12:17PM (#27370493)
That's not a counterpoint, it is a case in point! There are some energy sources like whale oil that had supply issues and roughly a single use that got displaced. But for our major energy sources with a vast supply we keep finding ways to use them in amounts that don't really decrease.
Re:G7 nations committing billions more to fossil fuel than g... by ashtonkem on Wednesday June 02, 2021 @12:42PM (#27370831)
It's kind of a counterpoint still. We tried and managed to replace coal for home heating and transport with something else, because coal kind of sucks for those things. The fact that coal continued to be used in new ways is a consequence of coal dropping in price and there being no real external pressure to eliminate coal usage. It's not clear what happens once there's strong pressure to eliminate these fuels from our economy, because we've never really tried it before.