Re:It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cry...
by miracle2k on Monday May 31, 2021 @11:45AM
(#27345221)
> No. Copyright must be explicitly assigned.
No one is talking about assigning copyright. The question is about a license to display the content on a website. I am fairly certain you have heard of non-verbal contracts before. For example, here is what the UK government has to say about an implied copyright license:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/license-sell-or-market-your-copy...
> Nah anyone can do it any time.
Anyone can also sell a signature of Clooney. And yet no one does, nor would anyone buy it. This is not something that plays into a serious analysis of the NFT space, and so I am not sure why you would want to find it interesting to talk about.
Re:It's time for us in the tech world to speak out about cry...
by arcticbull on Monday May 31, 2021 @06:36PM
(#27348838)
Nfts explicitly grant exactly no rights whatsoever and you will not find a judge that will impose that burden.
No. Copyright must be explicitly assigned.
> Also, consider that in NFTs, the only one selling an NFT to the Mona Lisa is Leonardo.
Nah anyone can do it any time.