Re:Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people t...
by ramraj07 on Monday May 31, 2021 @03:17AM
(#27341186)
Have I run a site comparable to Wikipedia? No. Do I know nothing about that topic? Debatable. Leaving that aside, Wikipedia was live and ticking when it had 1% of today’s coffers, so it’s hard to substantiate why they need money approaching a billion dollars for a non profit running a website all things considered.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people t...
by gcthomas on Monday May 31, 2021 @04:47AM
(#27341797)
I wonder how much Facebook spends on running _its_ website?
Re:Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people t...
by kaba0 on Monday May 31, 2021 @05:34AM
(#27342152)
They are not just running a website?
Re:Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people t...
by xvector on Monday May 31, 2021 @06:58AM
(#27342686)
Then their donation banner should reflect the true purpose of the donation, rather than misleading readers into thinking it’s necessary for Wikipedia.com.
Re:Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people t...
by kaba0 on Monday May 31, 2021 @07:44AM
(#27343020)
It is necessary for Wikipedia.
Re:Wikipedia is swimming in money–why is it begging people t...
by middleclick on Monday May 31, 2021 @02:04PM
(#27346672)
This assumes that traffic has not changed since "1% of its coffers". Traffic has grown and the site has become faster.