Yes, and I'm challenging that observation. "Making an observation" doesn't mean you're not subject to criticism or questioning.

You haven't meaningfully challenged anything they said, though. Your thing was an odd rant about the need to name things (not a hot take), and theirs seemed more focused, well

>>That is, an interrim scientific theory that will eventually be completely replaced by revisions of our physics.

But you were reading criticism of the naming in the original comment, which wasn't there.