News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the Impending Deletion of Charlie Bit My Finger by Inhibit on Thursday May 27, 2021 @09:50AM (#27303090)
The creator of a thing can decide to remove their copy of it and not license it further.

Someone else can pay for a token that signifies... something. At the very least, that they've purchased a token. I'm not sure what more.

Although unlike the author I'm okay with only the people who were so into a "cute baby" level video that they downloaded it for retaining a copy. Popular media getting forgotten in the churn of history is rather normal and it's worked out okay so far.

Re:On the Impending Deletion of Charlie Bit My Finger by elliekelly on Thursday May 27, 2021 @10:21AM (#27303472)
This is the big question I’ve yet to find a solid answer to about NFTs. First year law students are taught that property rights are a “bundle of sticks”[1] but I have absolutely no idea which “sticks” (if any?) an NFT conveys.

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundle_of_rights